NEVADA – INDICATORS

Score:

 

Nevada’s plan includes a variety of indicators that represent a holistic view of school success.

 

The state’s use of its long-term goals and interim targets within the achievement and graduation rate indicators clearly links the targets to a school’s overall rating. Nevada’s use of chronic absenteeism, school climate, and the completion of individual learning plans to measure student engagement broadens the accountability system while still employing rigorous, student-focused measures.

 

Nevada’s plan does not always provide detailed information on the definition of each indicator and how each indicator is calculated.

 

Several of the indicators include subcomponents with no guidance on the way they will be combined into one larger indicator. For example, a student engagement measure includes both chronic absenteeism and a school climate survey, but the plan does not specify how they would be combined.

 

The state could strengthen its plan by assigning greater weight to the four-year graduation rate, while still recognizing the value of an extended-year graduation rate.

LEARN MORE ABOUT INDICATORS

New Mexico

 

New Mexico proposed a high-quality list of meaningful indicators, including the growth of the lowest-performing students, extended-year graduation rates, chronic absenteeism, and a new college-readiness indicator.

 

Choose a state to see their plans around indicators: